When
I studied history of medieval India, observed that the invading
Muslims conquered the country as if, “came, saw and conquered”,
as the great Alexander said. Prior to that in early history we see
that outside invaders were not able to even enter into the mainland
India, Emperor Alexander’s invasion we can show for that matter as
an example. So, what was the reason? Many Muslim historians give
credit to the blessings of Allah to the invading army of the Muslim
but as I do not believe in such illogical and emotion based
explanations, I wanted to find out what had gone wrong so that they
could win all wars with Hindu rulers so easily.
At
that time, Afghanistan and a measure portion of present day Pakistan
was observing religion Buddhism. In mainland India, Jainism and
Hinduism with Brahmanic control were the important religions.
Buddhism and Jainism professed non-violence and under that, influence
people of those areas had become very non-violent and continued a
life of peace and stability. They prospered due to trade that passed
through those areas. Chinese merchandise passed through Afghanistan
(this is silk route) to the west and that trade was their main
activity, while Indian merchandise was passing through Sindh and
other parts of today's Pakistan. How Buddhism destroys capacity to
defend, we see today in Tibet. If you are a Buddhist or Jain, these
religions deprive you of your capacity to defend yourself and as a
result, any body can conquer you. This is the measure defect of these
two religions.
When
Mallick Amber invaded Afghanistan, he received practically no
resistance from the local people, as they were not prepared for such
an eventuality. Mallick Amber conquered that region with his crowd of
hooligans (they were called gazwa) and established his religion
perforce on the defeated people of that place. He converted those
people to his religion and infused in them the policy of violence
that is the main principle of Islam. They in turn spread the religion
to other parts in the same violent way. That means the victory of
Arab soldier was due to the Buddhism's non-violent religion and its
non-violence principle and not because the Arabs were any big
fighters. Similarly, in India Jainism made passage easy for the
Muslim marauders. During that time many kings from the north India
supported Jainism. Many even did not have any army worth the name! We
should note here that Arab hooligans could not defeat Pratihara
dynasty of Rajasthan who defeated every attack on their kingdom.
Actually Arabs could never enter India. It was invasion from northern
border of Punjab that Mogul entered and what religion they professed
was not Islam but Sufism. That shows that what religion came due to
Mogul invasion is not Islam and because we often do not understand
that they are not one we often continue to feel that Mogul introduced
Islam.
One
other theory says that Afghans particularly Pathan were businessmen
working to carry caravans of commodities through Arabia to Europe.
They willingly accepted Islam when Arabs promised free passage and
other benefits if they convert to their creed. That means Arabs did
not actually win them but purchased them.
Amongst
the Hindu rulers, the problem had different connotation. Here the
Brahmanic control was the problem. Brahmans were all out to
demoralize the warrior clans generally called Kshatrya. The method
they used was very callous. In that, whenever in any battle between
two Kshatrya clans any one as gets defeated, the Brahmans would
declare that defeated clan sudra (servant class). Brahmans were the
holders of priesthood and so their commands or decree was binding on
all and so the defeated clan would submit to that declaration and
accept the insult of becoming servant class or sudra which is the
fourth class in Hindus as per Brahmanic order (Bhagwatgita order is
different).
Kshatrya
class had distinction for holding some privileges. They had right to
posses weapons and hold them, right to learn all fighting skills,
right to learn scriptures and other disciplines, riding horse and to
possess one, to own and also drive the chariot, to wear a specific
head gear that indicate that the person is a Kshatrya. They were
supposed to boast a beard and mustaches. They dressed in crimson or
yellow colored silk attire. They could possess servants and slaves.
They had right to learn many subjects and be proficient in them. They
can have property of land and farms. Most importantly, they were
having a right of vote in the court of the King. Guru Nanak
reintroduced this Kshatriya order in his religion, that was called
Sikhism in Punjab. That helped stop further progress of Islam in
India. Guru Nanak did not invent any new religion, he only
reestablished Kshatrya order. Dress code of khalsa is actually dress
code of Kshatriya.
On
declaring them sudra, all above given privileges were lost to them
and instead they had to do following things. A Sudra must go to work
on the farm as servants in the houses of Kshatrya and Brahman and
also Vaishya (Trader class). They had to do all menial jobs and could
not demand any rights. In other words, a sudra was similar to a
slave.
Over
the period, the Brahmans demoralized many Kshatrya having been
defeated from battles with rival clans by declaring them sudra. As a
result, when Muslim marauders attacked there were hardly any
well-trained warriors in the country to defend it. India and Hindu
nation was lost to the invaders. If you read the accounts of how
temple of Somnath, Mohammad Gazni looted, you will know what a
pathetic condition Hindus had.
My
further research showed to me that the sudras of North India (from
Punjab to MP) are from Kshatrya clans of Jats, Yadaw, Greco-roman,
and Hun. In the western India the sudras are from the kshatrya of
Lohana, Jat, and Greco-roman. Today, we know Bhangi and ddhed, in
Gujarat and Rajasthan are actually Lohana, Jat and Greco-roman.
Greco-roman are descendants of Alexander’s army, they were
gradually absorbed into the Hindu system as Kshatrya. Present Hindu
system was being formed during the time after Alexander’s invasion.
In
Maharashtra, the Mahar was the indigenous kshatrya clan and the
Brahmans of Satawahan rulers (Deshastha Brahman) fooled them to
become sudra. I do not know of sudras of South India but I feel there
also story cannot be any different. Today measure population of India
is made of the sudras who are actually Kshatrya. Unfortunately, due
to neglect of many centuries they have forgotten their real value and
have accepted the present status. Nevertheless, many Kshatrya
embraced Islam during that rule and abandoned Hinduism. Most of the
Muslims of north India come from that type they are mostly Yadaw and
Singh. In Gujarat, we see Lohana and Jats taken to Islam to get away
from Brahman atrocities. Brahmans were responsible for the invasion
and conversion of many Hindus to the alien religions. British Raj
stopped that process by destroying importance of this callous
community. If I say it was British rule that saved Hindus from
atrocities of Brahmanic supremacy, it will not be any overstatement.
I have not done any facts finding of regions in easter and
north-eastern part of India.
This
research shows that the country lost freedom to the outsiders because
of Brahmans and their callousness. Today things are different. The
British Raj demoralized Brahman forces in their own coin. If we
carefully observe we see that most of all so-called freedom fighters
were from this callous Brahman community. Generally, British
government better looked after common persons in India, so they had
no resistance to them. All Hindus and Indians should thank God that
British came to rule in India and for saving them from the inhuman
behavior of Brahmans. Today Brahmans have no such sweeping powers any
more however, they are lurking in the shadows in new forms such as
BJP, RSS, Vishwa Hindu Parishad and many more sundry sobriquets. I
will not be surprised if they get a chance, may again bring their
foolish order and begin to harass Hindus once more. Bad part of the
story is that most Hindus are as yet, not aware of this danger from
Brahmans. By introducing act on banning cow slaughter we may say
Brahmanic intrusion has begun already.
You
may contact me on my Email ID given below,
You
are invited to visit my other blogs
Ashok
Kothare,
http://ashokkotharesblog.blogspot.com/
for
stories
I
reckon,
http://kotharesviews.blogspot.com/
for philosophy
You
may visit blog, Ideas
and tips on any subject,
http://kotharay.blogspot.in/
for intelligent discussions.
Freedom
of Expression, http://blogs.siliconindia.com/kothare/
for intelligent discussions.
No comments:
Post a Comment